Does a cell perform isoelectric focusing?

Flegr J. 1990: Does a cell perform isoelectric focusing? BioSystems 24 127-133. DOI: 10.1016/0303-2647(90)90005-L

» PDF

 

BioSystems, 24 (1990) 127-133 127

Elsevier Scientific Publishers Ireland Ltd.

 

Does a cell perform isoelectric focusing?

 

Jaroslav Flegr

(Received February l9th,1990)

(Revision received May 2nd,1990)

 

A model of intracellular electrical sorting of enzymes and organelles in the cytosol, based on isoelectric focusing, is proposed. The focusing is suggested to take place over a centrally symmetric pH gradient which in the cytosol of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is known to be 7.2-6.4. From published data on the energetic capacity and from the computed electric resistance of the S. cerevisiae cell, the maximum value of the electric field that can be maintained in the cytosol was estimated. The results showed that the strength of a centrally symmetric intracytosolic electric field could be as high as 90 mV/cm, which is sufficient to account for sorting of cytosolic proteins according to their isoelectric points. Although direct experimental evidence for intracellular isoelectric focusing is still missing, several phenomena of physiological importance can be understood on the assumption of its real existence.

 

Kegwords: Hypothesis; pH gradient; Electrophoretic sorting; Structure of cytosol.

 

  1. Introduction

The physiological importance of electrophoretic transport of molecules and organelles in a manner analogous to zone electrophoresis has been stressed by many authors; for reviews see DeLoof (1985, 1986), Robinson

(1985), Harold et al. (1985,1986) and Nuccitelli (1988). The existence of a pH gradient in the cytosol (Slavik,1983; Slavik and Kotyk, 1984; Tsien and Poenie,1986; Ross and Slavik,1987; Paradiso et al.,1987) suggests that also some analogy with isolectric focusing could be functioning in a living cell. It is obvious that if both an electric field and a pH gradient exist in the interior of the cell, then cytosolic ampholytes (e.g. proteins) are sorted according to their isoelectric points (pI) to occupy stable positions in distinct regions within the cell. The rates of many, if not all, biochemical reactions in the cytosol are supposed to be limited by the rates of diffusion of the reactants (Snol,1979). The importance of a process which could concentrate the reactants into small and distinct regions of the cell interior and thus overcome the limitation is evident.

In this paper, the possibility of intracellular isoelectric focusing operating in the S. cerevisiae cell is considered from an energetic point of view. Experimental data supporting the existence of intracellular isoelectric focusing are reviewed and its possible impacts on different physiological processes in the cell are discussed..

 

  1. The expenditure on intracellular isoelectric focusing in the energetic budget of the yeast cell

 

Slavik and Kotyk (1984) have demonstrated the presence of a continuous pH gradient ranging from pH 72 (cell centre) to pH 6.4 (cell periphery) in the cytosol of a living Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell. If such a gradient were to be utilised for isoelectric focusing of cell components, a centrally symmetric electric field with a negative potential in the cell centre would have to exist. One of a number of alternative models of electric field generation is shown in Fig. 1. It assumes that positive

Fig.1. Model of generation of an electric field in the cell interior and of an isoelectric focusing of a protein, pH 6.8.

 

ions are pumped into cisterns of the endoplasmic reticulum, from which the nuclear envelope is formed and whose lumen is known to communicate through transport vesicles or through channels with the extra­cellular space (Franke,1974).

The model does not take into consideration the influence of cytoskeleton and organelles such as lysosomes, mitochondria and micro­bodies. An interior of these organelles has often different pH from the rest of the cell, suggesting that they are electrically isolated from the cytosol. Such structures, of course, could highly influence on the geometry of the field in the real livin cell.

Also the cytoskeleton could play a big role in the real cell. Many cells, especially animal cells, show movements due to the activity of the cytoskeleton. It could be possible that the cytoskeleton keeps structures containing ion pumps in place in the cell interior so that the movements would not disturb the gradients too much.

The maximal strength of the field could be estimated using the published experimental data on S. cerevis;ae metabolism. To maintain a steady state, as required for efficient isoe­lectric focusing, a constant power would have to be invested to compensate for the electric current (. between electrodes. This power ( T can be expressed as

 

W = UI

 

where U is the difference of potentials between electrodes. From Ohm’s law we obtain

W =U2/R                                                                                (1)

 

where R is the resistance of the electrophor­etic chamber. The resistance of a thin spherical layer of electrolyte in a spherical electrophoretic chamber with two concentric spherical electrodes (a highly simplified and idealised model of the S. cerevisiae cell) can be expressed as

 

dR = (r dX/(4pXz)                                                                 (2)

 

where r is the resistivity of the electrolyte in a steady state of isoelectric focusing and X is the radius of the infinitesimally thin spherical layer. The total resistance of the electrolyte between electrodes (R) can be calculated as an integral

 

ò B r/(4 pX2) dX

A

 

hence

 

R=(r (1/B-1/A))/ 4 p                                                              (3)

 

where A and B are the radii of the outer and inner electrode, respectively. During isoelec­tric focusing, all electrically charged particles migrate toward the electrodes, which results in a continual increase of resistivity of the electrolyte. Finally, when only H+ and OH are left to transfer the electric current, the resistivity increases up to the value of pure water; for an electrolyte of pH near 7 this is about 1.8 x 10E7 W/cm (Svensson, 1962). For the S. cerevisiae cell, we can estimate the radius of the outer and inner electrode as 3.1 x 10-4 cm and 0.62 x   10-4 cm, respectively (Slavik and Kotyk, 1984). Substituting these values into Eqn. (3), we find that the resistance of the interior of the S. cerevisiae cell is about 1.85 x 1010 W. The maximum power which S. cerevisiae can invest into isoelectric focusing is 4.4 x 10-12 J/s, the power which the yeast spends on unidentified functions dif­ferent from the known metabolic processes (Lagunas,1976). From Eqn. (1) we obtain that this power is sufficient to maintain an intracellular difference of electric potentials equal to about 0.29 V, which represents an electric field of about 1.5 kV/cm.

This electric field strength seems to be rather low in comparison with the strength of electric fields used for separation of proteins in laboratory devices for isoelectric focusing. The question arises, how much and how quickly could the cellular proteins be focussed in this field. The efficiency of isoelectric focusing in directly proportional to two parameters, namely electric field strength and the value of the pH gradient. The former is more than three orders of magnitude higher in man-made apparatus for isoelectric focus­ing; the latter (3200 pH/cm), however, is nearly four orders of magnitude higher in the living S. cerevisiae cell. Also the distance which the proteins are expected to migrate (< 2.5 x 10-4 cm) is about five orders of mag­nitude less in the cell. Therefore, an electric field strength of 1.5 kV/cm would be more than sufficient for effective isoelectric focus­ing of intracellular components and their redistribution would be accomplished within seconds.

 

  1. Evidence for existence of intracellular iso­electric focusing

 

Although the existence of intracellular iso­electric focusing has not been proved experi­mentally, the actual existence of this phenomenon can be inferred from the follow­ing facts:

(1) An intracytosolic pH gradient has been shown to exist in different cells (Slavik,1983; Slavik and Kotyk, 1984; Tsien and Poenie, 1986; Ross and Slavik, 1987; Paradiso et al., 1987). The simplest mechanism whereby a cell could set up such a gradient is to generate an electric field between the centre and the peri­phery by some sort of electrogenic transport. The electric field than gives rise to a natural pH gradient (Svennson, 1961) and this, in turn, should lead to isoelectric focusing of ampholytes.

(2) Proteins labeled with fluorescent dyes injected into a cell often form distinct spheri­cal zones in the cytosol (Wehland and Weber, 1980; Wodsworth and Sloboda, 1983; Glacy, 1983). Some results even suggest that the shapes of these zones are spherical layers (Wehland and Weber, 1980), which agrees with predictions based on the model of intra­cellular isoelectric focusing.

(3) The hypothesis of intracellular isoelec­tric focusing is strongly supported by the results of 31P nuclear magnetic resonance studies (NMR). When cytosolic pH was esti­mated by NMR using inorganic phosphate and intermediates of glycolysis, values of pH 7.2 and 7.0 were obtained, respectively (Navon et al., 1979). This difference could be explained by different molecules being focused into dif­ferent regions of the cytosol; the region of maximal accumulation of glycolytic intermedi­ates probably coincides with the region of maximal occurrence of glycolytic enzymes.

A pH gradient has been demonstrated in S. cerevisiae cytosol using a pH-specific fluores­cent probe (Slavik and Kotyk, 1984). In con­trast, the sharp resonance peaks of most intracellular pH-sensitive molecules obtained with NMR studies would suggest that one distinct pH value rather than a pH continuum exists in the cytosol of the S. cerevisiae cell (Salhany et al., 1975; Navon et al., 1979; Bar­ton et al., 1980). This discrepancy can be explained if the presence of intracellular isoelectric focusing is taken into considera­tion. The molecule which is used for monitor­ing pH is not homogeneously distributed throughout the cytosolic compartment but is concentrated, according to its pI or its electric charge, in a distinct region of the cytosol, displaying the pH of that particular region rather than the average pH of the cytosol. It is worth mentioning that the resonance peak of highly diffusible (and, consequently, poorly electrofocusable) ions of inorganic phosphate is far broader than expected from theory and than observed for other 31P-containing molecules (Busby et al., 1970; Busby et al., 1978; Roberts and Jardetzky, 1981). This phenomenon, suggest­ing the existence of an intracytosolic pH gra­dient, can be detected in the intact cell only, not in a cell homogenate.

(4) On the basis of the structure of the genetic code, the properties of amino acids, and the character of the process of mutagenesis, a model describing the evolution of proteins has been constructed (Graur, 1986). The model shows that in the absence of strong selection constraints the pIs of pro­teins should converge toward mildly basic values. The large diversity in pIs among real proteins suggests that this parameter has its biological meaning and that it is controlled by natural selection. Experimental evidence sup­ports the same conclusion. Studies with pro­teins injected into living cells have shown that a parameter controlling the entry of a protein into a nucleus is its pI (Kreis and Birchmeier,1982). A similar study has shown that a strong correlation also exists between the pI of a protein and the rate of its degrada­tion in vivo (Dice and Goldberg, 1975). The process of intracellular isoelectric focusing could easily be the missing link between the physical constant, i.e. pI, and the biological properties of the protein.

 

(5) There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that the cytosol of a living cell exists in a highly organized state. Different cytosolic molecules are separated into distinct regions of the cell rather than homogeneously distributed throughout the cytosol. The rates of diffusion of proteins, but not of polysac­charides of the same molecular weight, are much lower in the cytosol of living cells than in a water solution of the same viscosity. Enzymatic-reaction rates are often different in cell homogenates than in living cells. For a review of this topic see Bhargava (1985) and Kaprelyants (1988).

 

  1. Possible significance of intracellular iaoelectric f ocusing f or cell physiology

 

Data suggest that a cell could generate an electric field of the strength of 1.5 kV/cm, which appears sufficient for efficient isoelectric focusing of intracellular ampho­lytes. This section shows that existence of this process would be advantageous from the point of view of cell physiology. In a bioche­mist’s test tube, the molar concentrations of enzymes are usually much lower than the concentrations of substrates, so the reactions follow a pseudo-first-order reaction kinetics. By contrast, the concentrations of enzymes and substrates in a living cell are often nearly identical (Lehninger,1978). Under such condi­tions the reaction follows the second-order reaction kinetics and the rate of diffusion of the reactants, rather than turnover number of the enzyme, would be the factor limiting the reaction rate. A process which could over­come this limitation would highly improve the efficiency of intracellular enzymatic reactions. Intracellular isoelectric focusing could be such a process. Of course, this would require a spa­tial coincidence of enzymes and corresponding substrates. While electrofocusing of enzymes is very likely, this is not the case with the low molecular weight, highly diffusible sub­strates, mostly lacking ampholytic character (Svensson, 1962). The results of Bernhard (1988), however, show that once trapped by the first enzyme of a particular biochemical pathway, the substrate seldom leaves the molecule of the enzyme to diffuse freely to the second enzyme of the enzymatic cascade. Substrates are rather transported between enzymes, being bound on their surfaces, via enzyme-enzyme collisions (Srivastava and Bernhard, 1985; Weber and Bernhard, 1982). In such a way, the focusing of enzymes would be sufficient zor an enhancement of the rate of biochemical processes.

Electrofocusing of enzymes could not only speed up biochemical processes: it also offers a powerful tool for the regulation of cell metabolism. A cell could avoid futile cycles simply by focusing enzymes of different bio­chemical pathways into different parts of its interior. Furthermore, phosphorylation, dephosphorylation, glycosylation, or other modifications that could change an enzyme’s pI would automatically result in its transloca­tion into a new cell region. This could switch particular biochemical processes on or off. In this case both reactants, i.e. the regulating enzyme and the regulated enzyme, are ampholytes and so they could be electro­focused into the same part of the cell. Theo­retically, the substrate specificity of the regulating enzyme could be based on the very fact that both enzymes share the same pI value.

Isoelectric focusing could also participate in processes of intracellular molecular transport. It has been estimated (Whetley,1985) that the time required for an average protein molecule to move across the interior of a HeLa cell by a simple diffusion would be about 26 or 27 min. Proteins introduced into a cell by microinjection are, however, seen to spread through the cell within seconds (Stacey and Allfrey, 1977). Similar velocities (0.1- 2.0 mm/ s) could be expected for proteins electro­migrating in an electric field of 90 mV/cm. Electrophoretically driven transport has been demonstrated in many biological systems (Jaffe, 19fi6; Jaffe et al., 1974; Woodruff and Telfer,1974; Jaffe and Woodruff,1979; Wood­ruff and Telfer, 1980; Cooper et al., 1989). Intracellular isoelectric focusing appears to offer a more versatile tool for assembling sophisticated material-transporting systems than zone electrophoresis. While the latter is just capable of separating intracellular parti­cles into two regions and the values of the electric charges of the particles merely influ­ence the migration rates, isoelectric focusing could sort the particles into a number of distinct cell regions, thus establishing a finely tune-up distribution of proteins and orga­nelles. For the transport of a molecule from one cell region to another by isoelectric focus­ing, only one substrate-specific step, i.e. a modification leading to a change of pI of the transported molecule, is necessary. The fol­lowing step, translocation of the molecule, could be performed by the sub­strate-non-specific mechanism of intracellular isoelectric focusing.

In the preceding paragraphs, intracellular isoelecric focusing of macromolecules, namely proteins, has been considered. There is no reason, however, to exclude higher struc­tures, e.g. subcellular particles and organelles, from these considerations. Because of their low diffusion coefficients, the transport or stabilisation of these structures in particular cell regions could be very efficiently controlled by isoelectric focusing (Vesterberg and Svensson, 196fi). Considering that pro­teins of different pI values could be inserted into different parts of organelle membranes, one might propose that the shape, orientation, and spatial distribution of intracellular mem­brane structures could all be controlled by the process of intracellular isoelectric focus­ing.

 

  1. Concluding remarks

 

Processes analogous to isoelectric focusing have been proposed to participate in the spa­tial arrangement of intracellular components. The presumed processes have been shown to fall within the range of the energetic capacity of the cell. Some possible physiological func­tions of intracellular isoelectric focusing have been discussed and some experimental data suggesting its existence have been reviewed.

Intracellular isoelectric focusing could play important roles in many different intracellular processes connected with compartmentalisation of the cell interior, transport of mate­rial, or transmission of physiological signals. Such processes could be especially important in a large cell. In nature two distinct types of cell architecture exist – the small prokar­yotic cell of bacteria and generally about three orders of magnitude larger eukaryotic cell of other organisms. The presence of endo­symbiotically originated organelles, mitochon­dria and plastids, is often considered a principal difference between the two types of cells. The discrepancy between monophylet­ical origin of the eukaryotic cell and probably polyphyletical origin of its endosymbionts, however, suggests a possible existence of a more fundamental difference. Such a differ­ence could theoretically be the presence of intracellular isoelectric focusing in the pre­eukaryotic cell and its absence in the prokaryotic one. This mechanism could enable the functioning of large cells; the large size is a necessary precondition for endosymbiosis. For this reason, it could be speculated that the origin of the eukaryotic cell was asso­ciated with the evolutionary emergence on the life scene of the mechanism of intracellu­lar isoelectric focusing.

 

Acknowledgements

 

I am grateful for the helpful comments of several colleagues, especially Dr. Jiri Cerka­sov and Dr. Apolena Cerkasovova, Charles University. Prague, and an anonymous ref­eree for the suggestion concerning the poss­ible role of the cytoskeleton in intracellular isoelectric focusing.

 

Corrigendum to „Does a cell perform isoelectric focusing?“[BioSystems 24 (1990) 127]

 

Jaroslav Flegr

 

The Author regrets that there was a serious numeric error in abowe paper. The correct value for a resistance of S. cerevisiae interior is 1.85 10E10 , i.e. approximately in eight orders of magnitude higher then originally claimed. If the correct value is substituted into Eq. 1, we find that S. cerevisiae cell can maintain an intracellular difference of electric potential equal to about 0.29 V which represents an electric field of about 1.15 kV/cm. The correct value suggests that the cell can achieve a highly effective isoelectric focusing of intracellular proteins and organelles by using less then 1% of its energy reserves.

The author thanks to Dr Stephen Bolsover of University College London for finding the error.

 

References

Anner, B.M., 1987, Electrical sorting: missing link between membrane potential and intracellular vesicle traffic? Perspect. Biol. Med. 30, 537-545.

Bernhard, S.A., 1988, The intracellular equilibrium ther­modynamic and steady-state concentrations of meta­, bolites. Cell Biophys.12,119-132.

Bhargava, P.M.,1985, Is the „soluble“ phase of cells struc­tured? BioSystems 18,135-140.

Busby, S.J.W., Godian, D.G., Radda, G.K., Richards, R.E.

and Seeley, P.J., 1978, Phosphorus nuclear-magnetic­resonance studies of compartmentation in muscle. Biochem. J.170,103-140.

Cooper, M.S., Miller J.P. and Froser, S.E., 1989, Electro­phoretic repatterning of charged cytoplasmic mole­cules within tissues coupled by gap junctions by externally applied electric fields. Dev. Biol.132,179­lss.

DeLoof, A.,1985, The cell as a miniature electrophoretic chamber. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 80A, 453-459.

DeLoof, A., 1986, The electrical dimension of cells: the cell as a minature electrophoretic chamber. Int. Rev. Cytol.104, 251- 352.

Dice, J.F. and Goldberg, A.L.,1975, Relationship between in vivo degradative rates and isoelectric points of pro­teins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 3893-3897.

Franke, W.W., 1974, Structure, biochemistry, and func­tions of the nuclear envelope. Int. Rev. Cytol. Suppl. 4, 71- 236.

­­Glacy, S.D., 1983, Subcellular distribution of rhodamine­actin microinjected into living fibroblastic cells. J. Cell Biol. 97,1207 -1213.

Graur, D., 1986, The evolution of electromobility of proteins. J. Theor. Biol.118, 443-469.

Harold, F.M., Kropf, D.L. and Caldowell, J.H.,1985, Why do fungi drive electric currents through themselves. Exp. Mycol. 9,183-186.

Harold, F.M., 1986, The Vital Force. A Study of Bioenergetics (Freeman, New York).

Jaffe, L.F.,1966, Electrical currents through the develop­ing Focus egg. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 56,1102- 1109.

Jaffe, L.F., Robinson, K. and Nucitelli, R., 1974, Local cation entry and self-electrophoresis as an intracellular localisation mechanism. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 238, 372

– 389.

Jaffe, L.F. and Woodruff, R.I.,1979, Large electrical cur­rents traverse developing Cecrofa follicles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76,1328-1332.

Kaprelyants A.S., 1988, Dynamic spatial distribution of proteins in the cell. Trends Biochem. Sci.13, 43-46.

Kreis, T.E. and Birchmeier, W., 1982, Microinjection of fluorescently labelled proteins into living cells with emphasis on cytosceletal proteins. Int. Rev. Cytol. 75, 209 – 227.

Lagunas, R., 1976, Energy metabolism of Saccharomces cerevisiae. Discrepancy between ATP balance and known metabolic functions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 440, 661- 674.

Lehninger, A.L., 1978, Biochemistry, 2nd edn. (Worth, New York).

Navon, G., Shulman, R.G., Yamane, T., Eccleshall, T.R., Lam, K-B., Baronofsky, J.J. and Marmur, J., 1979, Phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance studies of wild-type and lycolytic pathway mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemistry 18, 4487- 4498.

Norrie, D.H., Pietrowski, R.A. and Stephen, J., 1982,

Screening the efficiency of intracytosolic delivery ofmaterials to HeLa cells by liposomes. Anal. Biochem. 127, 276-281.

Nuccitelli R., 1988, Ionic currents in morphogenesis. Experientia 44, 657-666.

Paradiso A.M., Tsien R.Y. and Machen T.E.,1987, Digital image processing of intracellular pH in gastric oxyntic and chief cells. Nature 325, 447-450.

Roberts, J.K.M. and Jardetzky, 0., 1981, Monitoring of cellular metabolism by NMR. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 639, 53 – 76.

Robinson K.R., 1985, The responses of cells to electrical fields: a review. J. Cell. Biol.101, 2023-2027.

Roos, W. and Slavik, J.,1987, Intracellular pH topography of Peniczllium cycloPium protoplasts. Maintenance of pH by both passive and active mechanisms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 899, 67-75.

Slavik, J., 1983, Intracellular pH topography: determina­tion by a fluorescent probe. FEBS Lett.156, 227-230.

Slavik, J. and Kotyk, A., 1984, Intracellular pH distribution and transmembrane pH profile of yeast cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 766, 679-684.

Snol, S.E.,1979, Fiziko-Khimicheskie Faktory Biologiches­koi Evolyuts (Physicochemical Factors of Biological Evolution) (Nauka, Moscow).

Srivastava, D.K. and Bernhard, S.A.,1985, Mechanism of transfer of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide among dehydrogenases. Biochemistry 24, 623-628.

Stacey, D.W. and Allfrey V.G., 1977, Evidence for the autophagy of microinjected proteins in HeLa cells. J. Cell Biol. 75, 807 – 817.

Svensson, H.,1961, Isoelectric fractionation, analysis, and characterisation of ampholytes in natural pH gra­dients. I. The differential equation of solute concentra­tions at a steady state and its solution for simple cases. Acta Chem. Scand.15, 325-341.

Svensson, H.,1962, Isoelectric fractionation, analysis, and characterisation of ampholytes in natural pH gradients. II. Buffering capacity and conductance of isotonic ampholytes. Acta Chem. Scand.16, 456-466.

Tsien, R.Y. and Poenie, M.,1986, Fluorescence ratio imag­ing: a new window intro intracellular ionic signaling. Trends Biochem. Sci 11, 450-455.

Vesterberg 0. and Svensson, H., 1966, Isoelectric frac­tionation, analysis, and characterization of ampholytes in natural pH gradients. IV. Further studies on the resolving power in connection with separation of myoglobins. Acta Chem. Scand. 20, 820-834.

Wadsworth, P. and Sloboda R.D., 1983, Microinjection of fluorescent tubulin into dividing sea urchin cells. J. Cell Biol. 97,1249-1254.

Weber, J.P. and Bernhard S.A., 1982, Transfer of 1,3­diphosphoglycerate between glyceraldehyde-3-phos­phate dehydrogenase 3-phosphoglycerate kinase via an enzyme-substrate-enzyme complex. Biochemistry 21, 4189 – 4194.

Wehland, J. and Weber, K., 1980, Distribution of fluores­cently labelled actin and tropomyosin after microinjec­tion in living culture cells as observed with TV image intensification. Exp. Cell Res.127, 397-408.

Wheatley, D.N., 1985, On the possible importance of an intracellular circulation. Life Sci. 36, 299-307.

Woodruff, R.I., Telfer, W.H.,1974, Electrical properties of ovarian cells linked by intracellular bridges. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 238, 409-419.

Woodruff, R.I. and Telfer, W.H., 1980, Electrophoresis of proteins in intracellular bridges. Nature 286, 84-86.

 

Facebook Comments